|
Minnesota
State University Moorhead
|
|
Seminar Information |
|
|
Biol. 484 - Biology Seminar
EVALUATION FORM
- MAJOR PRESENTATION
| - | |
| Presenter: __________________________ | Reviewer: __________________________ |
| - | ||
|
|
||
| INTRODUCTION |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Is the entry into the subject orderly and coherent? | - | |
| Is the focus clear? | - | |
| - |
|
|
| BODY |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Are main questions clearly identified? | ||
| Are terms defined? | ||
| Are figures and tables clearly explained? | ||
| Is appropriate methodology presented? | ||
| Are major points developed adequately? | ||
| - |
|
|
| CONCLUSION / SUMMARY |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Are appropriate conclusions drawn? | ||
| Are the main points recapitulated and related to one another? | ||
|
|
|
|
| VISUAL AIDS |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Do the visual aids adequately complement the talk? | ||
| Are the visual aids clear, uncluttered, and easy to view? | ||
|
|
|
|
| RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Were the answers relevant, direct, and clearly articulated? | ||
|
|
|
|
| ABSTRACT |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Is the abstract an adequate / appropriate summary of the content and conclusions of the presentation? | ||
|
|
|
|
| REFERENCES |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Are the listed citations complete and in an acceptable and consistent form? | ||
|
|
|
|
| PERSONAL ASPECT |
Strengths |
Possible Improvements |
| Speech, poise, mannerisms, etc. | ||
| - | ||
|
|
|
|
OTHER SUGGESTIONS, COMMENTS, OR QUESTIONS:
WHAT IS YOUR OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESENTATION?
| SATISFACTORY: __________ | UNSATISFACTORY: __________ |
|
Seminar Information |
|
|
|
|
CONTACT PERSON: Robert Weibust - weibust@mnstate.edu
LAST UPDATE: 4/26/04

MSUM is an
equal opportunity educator and employer