Cornell University Press


DAMNED WOMEN: Sinners and Witches in Puritan New England

Elizabeth Reis
 

In her analysis of the cultural construction of gender in early America, Elizabeth Reis explores the intersection of Puritan theology, Puritan evaluations of womanhood, and the Salem witchcraft episodes. She finds in those intersections the basis for understanding why women were accused of witchcraft more often than men, why they confessed more often, and why they frequently accused other women of being witches. In negotiating their beliefs about the devil's powers, both women and men embedded womanhood in the discourse of depravity. Puritan ministers insisted that women and men were equal in the sight
of God, with both sexes equally capable of cleaving to Christ or to the devil. Nevertheless, Reis explains, womanhood and evil were inextricably linked in the minds and hearts of seventeenth-century New England Puritans. Women and men feared hell equally but Puritan culture encouraged women to believe it was their vile natures that would take them there rather than the particular sins they might have committed. Following the Salem witchcraft trials, Reis argues, Puritans' understanding of sin and the devil changed. Ministers and laity conceived of a Satan who tempted sinners and presided physically over hell, rather than one who possessed souls in the living world. Women and men became increasingly confident of their redemption, although women more than men continued to imagine themselves as essentially corrupt, even after the Great Awakening.

ELIZABETH REIS teaches history and women's studies at the University of Oregon and is the editor of Spellbound: Women and Witchcraft in America.

Women's Studies|Gender Studies|Religion|History - American   More about this Title

Paper  1999  240pp  6 x 9
13 black-and-white illustrations
ISBN: 0-8014-8611-4  $16.95 | £12.50  Quantity
Cloth  1997  248pp  6 x 9
13 black-and-white illus.
ISBN: 0-8014-2834-3  $42.50 | £31.50


NOT ALL WIVES
Women of Colonial Philadelphia

Karin Wulf

Marital status was a fundamental legal and cultural feature of women's identity in the eighteenth century. Free women who were not married could own property and make wills, contracts, and court appearances, rights that the law of coverture prevented their married sisters from enjoying. Karin Wulf explores the significance of marital status in this account of unmarried women in Philadelphia, the largest city in the British colonies.

In a major act of historical reconstruction, Wulf draws upon sources ranging from tax lists, censuses, poor relief records, and wills, to almanacs, newspapers, correspondence, and poetry to recreate the daily experiences of women who were never-married, widowed, divorced, or separated. With its substantial population of unmarried women, eighteenth-century Philadelphia was much like other early modern cities, but it became a distinctive proving ground for cultural debate and social experimentation involving those women. Arguing that unmarried women
shaped the city as much as it shaped them, Wulf examines popular literary representations of marriage, the economic hardships faced by women, and the decisive impact of a newly masculine public culture in the late colonial period.

Karin Wulf is Assistant Professor of History at American University. She is coeditor of both Milcah Martha Moore's Book: A Commonplace Book from Revolutionary America and the forthcoming Diary of Hannah Callendar, 1758?1788.

American History|Women's Studies|Regional-Northeast
Cloth Available in JANUARY 1999 240pp 6 1/8 x 9 1/4
2 maps, 5 black-and-white photographs, 7 tables
ISBN: 0-8014-3702-4 $39.95s | £29.50


INDIANS AND COLONISTS AT THE CROSSROADS OF EMPIRE
The Albany Congress of 1754

Timothy J. Shannon

On the eve of the Seven Years' War in North America, the British crown convened the Albany Congress, an Anglo-Iroquois treaty conference, in response to a crisis that threatened imperial expansion. British authorities hoped to address the impending collapse of Indian trade and diplomacy in the northern colonies, a problem exacerbated by uncooperative, resistant colonial governments.

In the first book on the subject in more than forty-five years, Timothy J. Shannon definitively rewrites the historical record on the Albany Congress. Challenging the received wisdom that has equated the Congress and the plan of colonial union it produced with the origins of American independence, Shannon demonstrates conclusively the Congress's importance in the wider context of Britain's eighteenth-century Atlantic empire. In the process, the author poses a formidable challenge to the Iroquois Influence Thesis. The Six Nations, he writes, had nothing to do with the drafting of the Albany Plan, which borrowed its model of constitutional union not from the Iroquois but from the colonial delegates' British
cousins.

Far from serving as a dress rehearsal for the Constitutional Convention, the Albany Congress marked, for colonists and Iroquois alike, a passage from an independent, commercial pattern of intercultural relations to a hierarchical, bureaucratic imperialism wielded by a distant authority.

Timothy J. Shannon is Assistant Professor of History at Gettysburg College.

Copublished with the New York State Historical Association
American History|Regional-Northeast
Cloth Available in JANUARY 1999 320pp 6 x 9
3 maps, 12 black-and-white photographs, 2 tables
ISBN: 0-8014-3657-5 $39.95s | £29.50


September 29, 2000