TOCAR
"Training Our Campuses Against Racism"

 

MSUM TOCAR Agenda & Minutes

TOCAR Collaborative Agenda & Minutes

TOCAR Collaborative Assessment Committee Minutes

Press Releases

MSUM
Anti-Racism
Team
Agenda &
Minutes

TOCAR First Year Report To Bremer Foundation

Links to TOCAR Collaborative Campuses


MSUM Anti-Racism Steering Team Meeting

November 3, 2002

Present: Warren Wiese, Abner Arauza, Donna Rosh, Ron Jeppson, Ryan Sylvester, Judy Peterson, Amy Phillips, Linda Palmer, Ben Blair, Tracy Clark, Veronica Michael, Yoke-Sim Gunaratne, Steve Pletta, and Phyllis May-Machunda

Absent: David Crockett, Charane Wilson, Mary Richardson, Peter Hartje, Aya Reid, and Adam Troy

·       
Big Picture/Small World exercise.
·       
Minutes approved with one correction, Linda Palmer not Laura.
·       
Review of President’s In-Service:

-         Good attendance, good conversation.
-         Commissioning went all right, still some confusion with the purpose of this group.
-         Some (2) faculty felt it was an attack on white males.
-         People were responding, but not understanding all the components.
-         Many negative comments before the event of having to attend, none afterward.
-         Wellstone announcement was difficult to deal with and remain focused.
-         Video was difficult to hear (quality of tape).
-         Good to raise awareness, get individuals talking, sharing.
-         Wasn’t very focused, curriculum session noted several times.
-         Questions not addressed having to do with the other minority groups; other “isms”.
-         Liked keynote (mostly) and would like to bring her back; however some faculty expressed 
           they didn’t get anything out of the speaker.
-         Concern that very few had seen the plan that Tess was talking about. Would have been 
           better to have it available prior to the in-service.

·        Updates:

-         MSUSA wants to look at minority retention centers on campus.
-         MSUSA president will come if requested.
-         CD Committee (Senate) met with Residence Hall director; it was a good meeting on 
           issues.
-         CD Committee (University) dealt with increasing credit hours to 6 in the “F” category. 
           Committee will forward recommendations to APAC. Liberal studies committee also 
           recommended the same.
-         Additional Trainings: TOCAR Level 1 trainings in the spring. 4 or 5 will be arranged. 
           Student Leaderships and Education faculty/methods instructors. These would generally 
           be 1-day trainings that can accommodate about 45 people.
-         December 8 – hate crime response training workshop.
-         Suggesting having Task Force on Diversity document review.

·        Institution Assessment Survey feedback:

-         Survey appears really long, (doesn’t really take that long to do).
-         Six responses per question seems like a lot but is part of the methodology.
-         Size of the type should be increased (not final format).
-         Seemed complete, wide range of questions.
-         May need an initiative to fill it out. Suggested to do something like a candy bar, 
           Bookstore coupon or money.
-         Example of University of Maryland at College Park was positive: ticket in a drawing for 
           cash prizes (one $100, two $50, five $20) or free movie passes.
-         If on-line, have an automatic number assigned to each one.
-         Hoping to get a certain percentage response from mailing to all of the faculty and staff.
-         Do faculty, staff, and administration in January; correspond with other campuses.
-         Suggestion to have it done in several parts.
-         Structure it so that if the response is N/A, a person can move ahead to another question.
-         Consensus that is more important to provide incentives rather than shorten. Bookstore is 
           doing “Buy one item, get second at half off” – Amy will inquire if they would like to do 
           the same.
-         Important to provide definition of “People of color”.
-         Question about religious affiliation. Consensus it has value to bring in.
-         Q. 29 page 5 – makes some assumptions that may need clarification.
-         Q. 33 page 3 – difficult to interpret and can this be done on the computer? Extra word 
           in statement. 

Continuing of Anti-Racist Visioning Statements

·       
Continuum that was offered at the training.
·       
Institutional life represents full participation and mutual power with diverse racial, cultural and 
           economic groups in determining its mission, structure, policies and practices.
·       
Need to gather history of institution, look where power is, where/how decisions are made, 
           who makes up the institution, who needs to be involved and what the barriers are.
·       
Need to deal with perception vs. reality of the institution and bridge that gap.
·       
Use the model in Wisconsin to bring all of our pieces together – another area for Dr. Arenas 
           to help with.
·       
Need to use the Cultural Diversity plan when approved.
·       
Terry Shoptaugh’s institutional history was distributed (Veronica’s questions).
·       
Summary areas exist with pieces of information that need to be brought together. Phyllis 
           May-Machunda will have students begin to gather information.
·       
White Earth history also needs to be included, as does the Multicultural Affairs program.
·       
History of positive action at MSUM needs to be told.
·       
History of when the various minority student organizations came in to being.
·       
Some history of diversity in region numbers is important to review.
·       
People that might assist in history: Helen Klassen, Erma Vizenor, Yvonne Condell, Roland 
           Dille, Lois Selberg, Soc Glasrud (other retired faculty should be reviewed) Gray Dragons 
           and retired teachers – Del Corrick, John Neumaier, David Boleau, Gerry Haukebo, DC 
           Cole.
·       
Phyllis is working with a group to develop questions to give these individuals –other 
           suggested questions should be emailed to Phyllis.
·       
Suggestion to develop questions and have them taped to create record.

Team Structure Reviewed

·       
Almost 70 people have received training through faculty – some are willing to help with unit 
            development.
·       
Individual teams will need to begin work within their units. Identify barriers; offer strategies 
            to remove these barriers and build into the university plan. Cultural Diversity plan will 
            provide framework.

Next meeting:  Have an open conversation about units, roles, differences from Cultural Diversity Task Force.  How our work comes forward, mission, how this will come together. Not have an agenda but focus on specifics of what each person’s role is. Inform the campus of the differences between an anti-racist institution and cultural diversity task force.

*          Each person should bring their binders from training and review Section #3 “Applying the Analysis”.

The next meeting is scheduled for November 25, 2002 10-12 in CMU 203. 

Upcoming meeting for calendars:  December 12, 2002 10-12 meeting

cc:  President Barden
       Cabinet

  
Back to TOCAR Home Page


an equal opportunity educator and employer

Contact Les Bakke
Last Update Date:  05/14/03