Evaluation of Discussion
(Used with
permission -- developed by L. Nelson)
If you are to develop as a thinker,
you will need to develop as a writer as well. In this course your discussion
takes the form of writing being we do not meet face-to-face. To develop as a
writer, you must impose upon yourself the same standards that good writers impose
upon themselves. The key question I will ask myself as I grade your written
work is “What specifically does your writing demonstrate about your ability
to reason/think?”
As you discuss/write, here are some
key points you should keep in mind:
- Make clear the question or issue
you are discussing or you will drift. Clarify the question you are focused
on and stick to that question throughout the discussion. Show how each point
is relevant to that question. Are you answering the question for discussion?
- You should give examples and
illustrations wherever clarification of your meaning is needed. When you do
not give concrete examples and illustrations to make your point clear, you
demonstrate that you do not know how to clarify your thought, or for some
reason have chosen not to. You should make clear the logical relations between
the sentences and paragraphs you write. Use transitional words and critical
vocabulary.
- Analyze key concepts whenever
it is needed.
- When you write sentences that
can be interpreted in many different ways (and you do not make clear which
meaning you intend), you demonstrate that you are thinking in a vague way.
You should therefore strive to write so that you make clear precisely what
you mean. Ask others to critique your work.
- Do not make sweeping generalizations
or judgments about positions you have not sufficiently analyzed. If you do
that, you are demonstrating ignorance and lack of perspective. Demonstrate
that you have considered all reasonable ways of looking at an issue.
- Of course you should use correct
spelling and grammar. Occasional misspellings or poor word usage is human.
Sometimes our fingers move slower than our minds and we type in error. Be
sure and review your writing.
- Because we are using a discussion
format in this course, invite others to comment on your thoughts. Do they
agree or disagree? Each participant has introduced themselves and based on
their past experience you might want to request specific classmates to comment
based on their experience. This makes the discussion more helpful and interesting.
Each discussion assignment
will be evaluated on the following scale. If an assignment is
worth 15pts, the scale will be adjusted accordingly. For example, instead
of 5 pts, the pts would range from 13-15 for excellent work, 10-12pts for good,
7-9pts for average, 4-6pts for below average, and 1-3pts for the lowest grade.
| 5 pts |
- Excellent in every respect.
- Discussion has a clear development
of the topic with consistent demonstrated thinking skills.
- Precise and well-reasoned—doesn’t
drift.
- Writing demonstrates assumptions,
inferences and creative thought.
- Analyzes issues clearly,
usually formulates information clearly, distinguishes the relevant from
irrelevant, and usually recognizes key questionable assumptions.
- Discussion indicates sensitivity
to important implications and consequences.
|
| 4 pts |
- Good in most respects
- Demonstrates more strengths
than weaknesses
- Clear in discussing the
issue; precise, well-reasoned
|
| 3 pts |
- Acceptable.
- Demonstrates more than a
minimal level of skill, but is inconsistent.
- Discussion has as many weaknesses
as strengths.
|
| 2 pts |
- Demonstrates only a minimal
level of understanding and skill in addressing the issue.
- The discussion lacks substance
and demonstration of much thought being put into the assignment.
- Assignment has more weaknesses
than strengths.
|
| 1 pt |
- Fails to demonstrate
the thinking skills and abilities which are at the heart of this course.
- Discussion is vague, imprecise
and unreasoned --very little, if any, analysis of the issue.
- Assignment appears to have
been done pro forma, the student simply going through the motions without
really putting any significant effort into thinking his or her way through
them.
|
| 0 pts |
Assignment not submitted |