|
Specific Review Standards: |
Yes |
No |
Notes |
|
I.1
|
Introduction
to the Course:" a statement OR "Welcome Letter"
introduces the student to the
course and to the structure of the student learning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.2
|
Introduction
to the Instructor (paragraph, possibly a photograph or a link to
your E-Folio)
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.3
|
Have
students provide a brief introduction to themselves via discussion board
(optional).
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.4 |
Links in the Course Policies and Schedule section to help documents relating to the
instructional management system or course web site. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.7 |
In addition, the instructor must include the
following items for a hybrid/online course syllabus.
Any student requirements / responsibilities for course interaction are
clearly articulated: |
|
| |
List of required course technologies.
Plugins and Readers that may
be required |
|
|
|
| |
Notification of
cooperative groupwork, graded discussion, etc.
Electronic Group Work Areas,
Teaching through Discussion Links |
|
|
|
| |
Netiquette
Guidelines (MSUM
Netiquette Guidelines) |
|
|
|
| |
Guidelines
for Discussion / Discussion Grading Rubric (sample) |
|
|
|
|
I.8 |
Permission
Consent Form (sample) to allow use of submitted discussions, assignments,
etc. as examples for future offerings of the course. Add
how long the permissions stand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.9 |
The elements of the
course - learning content, instructional methods, technologies, and
course materials -- complement each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I.10
|
Program framework
- to be completed by Education and Educational Leadership
programs) -- how
does this course fit into the program? |
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Review Standards: |
Yes |
No |
Notes |
|
III.1
|
The types of assessments selected
measure the stated learning objectives and are consistent with
course activities and resources. Examples: proctored
exams, project-based learning, electronic portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
III.2
|
The grading policy is easy to locate and understand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
III. 3.
|
Grades are available online via
web-based gradebook so that
students can monitor their progress. |
|
|
|
|
|
III.
4.
|
The types of assessments selected
and the methods used for submitting assessments are appropriate
for the distance learning environment. (electronic dropboxes, email attachments, publisher's
web-based exercises, proctored exams, oral exams using Horizon Wimba) |
|
|
|
|
|
III.
5.
|
Multiple methods of student
evaluation measure the achievement of the stated outcomes.
For example, formative assessment techniques (including practice
quizzes, homework, self-tests, ungraded
activities) provide immediate feedback to learners. Summative
assessment techniques (research papers, exams, portfolios, projects)
provide more formal, graded assessments.
A |
|
|
|
|
|
Specific Review Standards: |
Yes |
No |
Notes |
| Learner to Content Contact: |
| |
Course employs active learning
strategies. |
|
|
|
| Instructor to Learner Contact: |
| |
Prompting -- the
course developer has provided for monitoring individual progress,
notification about lack of online presence, and notification about
failure to meet deadlines |
|
|
|
| |
Instructor has
planned for REGULAR contact with the students via phone,
email, discussion board, pager, etc. |
|
|
|
| |
Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability
(turn-around time for email, grades posted, etc.) |
|
|
|
| |
Directions for contacting instructor are clear and specific (online
office hours, subject line for email helps organization of electronic
communication, etc.) |
|
|
|
| |
Student
understands learning style (VARK) |
|
|
|
| Learner to Learner Contact: |
| |
Instruction provides for learner to learner interaction
via email, chat, discussion board, posting news items |
|
|
|