Stephen Hamrick
Evaluations
Spring 2005
English 490
3:00-4:15 MW
Minnesota State University Moorhead Student's Evaluation of Course and Instruction
This evaluation is designed to aid the faculty member in improvement of instruction. It may also be used in university decisions affecting this instructor. Your answers will be kept anonymous and the faculty member will not have access to these forms until after grades for the course have been submitted.
A. What did you like Most about the course?
B. What did you like Least about the course?
C. Would you recommend this instructor to your friends?
D. Any additional comments regarding the course or instructor?
(a) Exceptional (b) Very good (c) Satisfactory (d) Poor (e) very poor
1. How would you rate the instructor's overall teaching performance?
2. How would you rate the instructor's knowledge of the subject matter?
3. How would you rate the instructor's respect and concern for students?
A. I liked that he course kept to the text as far as work, discussion, etc. is concerned. Many classes digress too much from the text and become classes of theology/philosophy or of history.
B. The worst part of the course as the online testing. It is new and untried but the limitations of the online testing seemed to be significant in whether or not the grade received is fair.
C. Yes, I would recommend Professor Hamricks one who keeps to the text.
D. There was an excellent use of other materials & sources for lecture and discussion.
1. a, 2. a, 3. a.
A. The abundance of knowledge the two professors brought to the reading of Dante – both in terms of contextualization and explanation of specific passages.
B. We needed more time.
C. Both, yes.
D. N/A
1. a, 2. a, 3. b.
In the space below, comment on the instructor’s performance in this class, his/her degree of preparedness and any other aspect of his/her teaching you would like to mention. Also comment on reading, workload, exams and papers, and rate this course in relation to other English courses you have taken.
Both professors performed admirably and their respective differences in style and concerns met nicely – the team teaching allowed for a very full experience in my opinion. Both were well prepared and thorough. At times the reading load was exhausting but I expected such. Other workload was manageable, thought I was surprised by having two papers due for the final. The course was challenging & interesting – more in-depth than many courses I have taken. Overall I am very satisfied with the way this course turned out.