Evaluations
Stephen Hamrick
Spring 2007
English 314/314 T Shakespeare/Shakespeare Theory
12:00-1:40 T H
Section # 001969/001970
Minnesota State University Moorhead Student's Evaluation of Course and Instruction
This evaluation is designed to aid the faculty member in improvement of instruction. It may also be used in university decisions affecting this instructor. Your answers will be kept anonymous and the faculty member will not have access to these forms until after grades for the course have been submitted.
A. What did you like Most about the course?
B. What did you like Least about the course?
C. Would you recommend this instructor to your friends?
D. Any additional comments regarding the course or instructor?
A. Class discussion was usually pretty good.
B. N/A
C. Yes.
D. N/A
A. The instructor made Shakespeare less intimidating and helped make the text relevant to cultural/social/etc. issues today.
B. N/A
C. Yes.
D. N/A
A. The skills/terms we learned about. Useful for other classes. This course also made Shakespeare “easier” to understand/read.
B. N/A
C. Sure.
D. N/A
A. The in depth discussion of the text and the political and social context it was put in.
B. The last paper.
C. Yes.
D. No.
A. The instructor.
B. That I wasn’t able to master explication.
C. Yes.
D. No.
A. Class discussion.
B. The videos we watched.
C. Yes.
D. Great teacher, was fair and treated us like adults.
A. I liked that we covered a wide range of material and put it in historical perspective.
B. It really challenged me, but that isn’t bad I guess.
C. Yes.
D. I would have liked if the syllabus wouldn’t have changed so much.
A. I liked that we learned more about the contexts of the plays rather than just what happens in them.
B. The expectations.
C. They really have no choice if they want to take Shakespeare at MSUM.
D. N/A
A. Professor Hamrick’s immense knowledge of the subject matter.
B. It’s hard to follow along, sometimes.
C. Yes.
D. I liked it a lot better than 211!
A. The teaching was very, very informative. It gave us a better understanding of the material, and was interesting to learn.
B. Mostly the length of the course itself T TH 12-1:40.
C. Yes.
D. No.
A. The last play where we were able to slow down and get a better understand of the way the concepts we’ve been learning actually work applied to a text.
B. So much to cover in so little time.
C. Yes, if they enjoy a challenge.
D. N/A
A. Challenging, Instructor knowledgeable, Instructor engaging, Empathetic. HIGH Expectations! Great use of variety of Media.
B. N/A
C. Yes!
D. Keep up the Great Work! I have grown in so many ways. Thank you!
A. I like that I am more comfortable with Shakespeare’s work. I don’t find it to be as intimidating as I did when I first walked in.
B. I would liked to have different activities in class, like small group discussions, etc., rather than just the same format every time.
C. Yes.
D. I would prefer that Prof. Hamrick would not use obscenities. I especially don’t think that the “F” word is appropriate language for a professor / role model to use. Also, if you tell your students not to put their feet up on the chairs you shouldn’t do it either. (Remember, you are a role model for us.)
A. The extra-curricular of seeing the play was the best. It brought a frame of reference for me to relate to as the text.
B. Guest speakers could have been nice. Bring Carollo in for example to elaborate on postcolonial critism for a day would have brought new perspective on the voice of the ?
C. Yes. Dr. Hamrick is very qualified and engages in life long learning.
D. Bring in a cultural anthropologist guest speaker and involvement wish other professors could create elaboration. This happens more at private universities though MSUM does this ? of the classroom.