Psy 348 Attention / Consciousness
|
Assignment – Explain & note examples &/or empirical support for each of the following: Cocktail Party Phenomenon: Colin Cherry's dichotic listening & shadowing Early selection: Broadbent's filter Intermediate selection: Treisman's attenuator Late selection: Deutsch & Deutsch, Norman, MacKay Task load (a.k.a. "resource allocation") Divided attention, automatic processing, & task difficulty The Stroop task Due in class, typed, Tuesday, Sep 09 |
Selective attention
Attending to one conversation while tuning out another one
Colin Cherry – cocktail party phenomenon – dichotic listening & shadowing:
physical characteristics of the stimulus are paramount in successful attending;
semantic characteristics are largely irrelevant
The theoretical problem: we cannot attend to everything simultaneously
so there is some sort of limiter: but what is it, and how does it work?
Filter & bottleneck theories
Donald Broadbent – Early sensory-level filter
Anne Triesman – Early sensory-level attenuator
Deutsch & Deutsch – Late filter
Attentional-resource theories
Assume finite pool of cognitive resources available for attending
Sounds good, but criticized as overly vague
The paradigmatic task: The Stroop task
RED GREEN BLUE PINK
BLUE RED PINK GREEN
GREEN PINK BLUE RED
PINK RED GREEN BLUE
Divided attention
e.g., Driving car while using cell phone
Major problem: #1 factor in auto accidents:
Recent #2 factor in auto accidents:
Ulric Neisser ~ Robert Becklen ~ Elizabeth Spelke
We can learn to attend to two tasks simultaneously,
but it takes considerable practice
Success in divided attention depends on difficulty of the tasks
Two very hard tasks = almost impossible to divide attention
One very hard task, one easy = can be learned with difficulty
Two easy tasks = easy to learn
Controlled versus automatic processes
Note that controlled processes require full conscious awareness
These usually involve difficult tasks
Automatic processes often occur with little or no conscious awareness
These usually involve easy tasks
Or else difficult tasks that have been very well learned
Automatic processing X divided attention
Once an attentional task has become automatic, e.g. well-learned,
then divided attention with another, relatively easy task, is possible
Application: Attention & Advertising
Two compelling attentional issues in advertising:
To catch attention (problem in selective attention)
To hold attention (problem in sustained attention)
The underlying principles in advertising involve several cognitive processes or attentional stimuli,
crossed with various motivators that advertisers believe are fundamental to
(1) humans in general or (2) the target group in particular:
Cognitive factors or stimuli Motivators
Subconscious / preconscious Sex
Classical conditioning Health ~ relief from illness
Repetition Companionship
Contrast / Brightness Happiness/”good times”
Color Curiosity
Movement Etc
Information
Etc.
Note “emotionality” component of many of the motivators
Common psychological techniques used in ads:
Classical conditioning
desirable something/somebody/event – repeatedly paired with – product/message
Repetition
a component of classical conditioning,
but also works by itself
often presented as variations on a theme
Strong attention attractors:
sharp contrasts - bright colors - movement - humans, animals - famous person - surprise - etc
“Intrinsic motivators,” e.g., sex [both symbolic & explicit] - humor - fear - etc
Cognitive stimulation, e.g., puzzles - irony & wit – complexity - whimsy - social & cultural concerns -
subtlety (e.g., in contrasts, colors, composition, emotional tone) - etc
Does “subliminal,” i.e., subconscious or preconscious, advertising work?
Marcel – 1970's & 1980’s
Priming & categorization:
Priming stimuli: visual stimuli presented very fast (20 – 110 msec)
[Aside: saccadic eye movements = 200 msec]
Participant generally cannot name what she saw
Subsequent categorizations tend to be based on the priming stimuli
Zajonc 1970’s – 1990’s
Emotion is a major factor in cognitive processes – much research & other evidence
Unfortunately greatly ignored by academic psychology [C.f., Descartes’ influence]
WH & Jesse Howard, 1997, 1998:
Words presented very briefly (~50 msec), many times,
using positive, negative, or neutral connotations
Afterwards participants were influenced by the emotional connotations in a
liking task, although they couldn't say whether they’d seen the words before.
So, regarding advertising:
Subliminal messages do not work directly – that is, the viewers will not subsequently
recall the specific product being advertised.
However, combining “subliminal” with emotion & classical conditioning may be very powerful.
Add to this the effects of repetition and various other stimulus properties, such as
movement, color, contrast, etc., and the effect of the ad may be almost irresistible.
Classical conditioning is one of the major ways that humans learn things.
Review: Pavlov’s classical conditioning paradigm:
UCS àààà UCR
The UCS automatically elicits the UCR
CS is paired with the UCS several times. Then
CS àààà CR
That is, the CS now elicits the CR, even though the UCS is no longer present.
Much of human learning is thought to occur this way, even when we aren’t aware of it!
Advertisers use classical cond to “teach” consumers to like and want particular products
UCS UCR
Something desirable/attractive/etc To want, desire, want to be like, etc
[Attractive people, places, things . . .] [We admire, like, want, . . .]
CS CR
Product/message We want, desire, etc
So we learn to want, like & presumably purchase a particular product
This could also be used to lead people to support causes, political parties, etc
Summary
Advertising is intensively concerned with attracting and maintaining attention.
This involves extraordinary management of several attentional factors.
The “sensory” factors are carefully designed to maximize “attention-getting” effects
– color, contrast, movement, etc.
The cognitive factors are manipulated intensively depending on the product and the target audience
The general approaches tend to fall into 2 or 3 major categories:
Sex
Information
Humor/Delight
Repetition is then used intensively to “fix” the audience’s awareness of the ad’s content
Ads are almost invariably based on classical conditioning or else sheer repetition
Both of these are intimately related to both selective and sustained attention
Exercise:
Part 1 Find three ads, one for each of the three categories mentioned above.
Send a PowerPoint slide of one of the ads with brief analytical notes regarding its attentional
components, as an email attachment, to me for presentation & discussion in class.
Date due: Mon, Sep 15, 6:00 p.m.
Part 2 Send Power point slides of the other two ads to me, with brief analytical notes as above.
Date due: Fri, Sep 19 3:00 p.m.
Part 3 Bring a written attentional analysis of just
ONE of the ads to class on Tues, Sep 23 – approximately 2 – 3 pages.
Include a printed copy of the ad with your analysis.
Slide formats:
Font size = 18
Layout : blank – DO NOT use one of the preformatted layouts unless you know how to modify its font sizes, etc
For your ad, be sure that it will fit onto the slide as a reasonably large picture – very small pics usually don’t enlarge well in PowerPoint.
Pics that are too large for the slide, however, can easily be reduced in size, just by clicking & dragging one of the corners, without loss of clarity.
Be sure to put your name on the slide! If slide has no name, then I won’t know whose it is.
Be sure to save each slide with your name & the attention category as the filename:
e.g., If it were my slide, I'd name the file as: Hallford humor
Remember: when you send the slide to me, put 348 & your name in the subject line of your email.