Philosophy 105: Philosophical Thinking
Spring 2003
Theodore Gracyk
 

Office: Bridges 359B     Phone: 236-4089           
Office Hours: MWF 9-10 a.m., Noon-1:20 p.m.
                   TH 10 a.m. & by appointment

Required Texts:  

  • Robert C. Solomon, The Big Questions (6th edition) 
  • Course Reading Packet (available in the bookstore)

Course Goals: 

  • To gain knowledge of the field of philosophy, including the views of some significant philosophers.
  • To enhance ability to critically analyze writing and thinking.
  • To improve thinking and writing about philosophical issues.

Grading Policies:  

You will be graded on seven things:

  • Five typed essays
  • Frequent in-class writing
  • 8 short Quizzes

Each of these elements of the course will be weighted equally.

Papers are due at the start of class on their due date.

Late work that does not receive prior authorization to be late cannot receive a grade above C+. Late work that has not been submitted within one week of its due date will drop another grade step for each day that it is late. (This means that a paper that is two weeks late is a failing paper.)

There is no penalty for a late paper if you have received prior authorization to hand it in late. The best way to receive prior authorization is by speaking to me or by telephoning me (if I am not there, just leave a message on my voice mail). Leaving me a voice mail message will automatically grant you a one day extension on a due date. Email is fine if done several days in advance (and I will acknowledge it by return email). But email is unreliable for contacting me on the due date itself because I may not have time to see it before the start of class, when it is due.

In-class writing is automatically late if not handed to the professor during the class period in which it is written. 
In-class writing
will often draw upon the assigned readings. Failure to do the reading may result in a reduced grade for this writing.  One in-class writing grade will be dropped (which is equivalent to one unexcused absence without penalty to your grade) when calculating this part of your total grade.

Rough drafts of writing will sometimes be required for discussion during class time. If you do not have copies of your rough draft on a day that it is to be discussed, it will be treated as a missed in-class writing.

Official University Events and medical emergencies for self or immediate family are the sole basis for exceptions to the above policies, and will require evidence (e.g., a note from your athletics coach for a university sports event or a note from your doctor).

There is no "extra credit" or "make-up" work.

Grades are not posted. If you'd like me to mail your final grade to you, submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard or envelope along with your portfolio. Or email me with a request that I email your grade when it is computed.  (For email link, click here)


Important Dates 

Monday, Jan. 20 MLK Holiday: No Class
Wednesday, Feb. 5 Bring draft of 1st paper to class (2 copies)
Friday, Feb. 7  Summary Paper Due 
Wednesday, Feb. 26 Bring draft of 2nd paper to class (2 copies)
Friday, Feb. 28 Comparison & Contrast Paper Due 
March 17-21 Spring Break - No classes 
Tuesday, April 8 Withdrawal deadline 
Friday, April 18  No Class (Good Friday)
Monday, March 31 Critique or Advocacy Paper Due 
Monday, April 28 Simple Argument Paper Due 
Monday, May 12
FINAL EXAM: 3 p.m. Thesis paper due, submitted with the previous four papers.

 


Initial Reading Schedule 
(These dates are tentative and subject to revision)

Read assignments before coming to class on the specified day. Assignment dates will be posted on the website as we proceed.

Friday, Jan. 17   Solomon, Chap. 2 (The Meaning of Life)

Wednesday, Jan. 22   Solomon , Chap. 6 (The Self)

Friday, Jan. 24   Plato's Phaedo (in course pack)

Monday, Jan. 27   Solomon, Intro: A little logic

Friday, Jan. 31   Solomon, pages 116-131

Friday, Feb. 7     Lu Chi's Wen Fu  (in course pack)

Monday, Feb. 10   Oliver Sacks (in course pack)

Wednesday, Feb. 12   Solomon, Appendix III (Informal Fallacies)

Friday, Feb. 14      Herskovits (in course pack)

   Click here for handout on relativism and absolutism 

Monday, Feb. 17    Shaw (in course pack)

Wednesday, Feb. 19      Staver (in course pack)

Friday, Feb. 21              Davis (in course pack)

Justification of War 

Monday, March 3           Moseley, "Just War Theory" 

Wednesday, March 5     Novak, “Asymmetrical Warfare” & Just War"

                                 Aquinas On Just War 

Here is our nation's official justification for war with Iraq. A longer version is here.

Skepticism 

Monday, March 10       Descartes, Meditation One 
                               Solomon textbook, Chapter Five

Wednesday, March 12    Descartes, Removal of Doubt 

Can we prove that God exists? 

Monday, March 24       Solomon textbook, Chapter Three 

The Problem of Evil 

Monday, March 31       Solomon textbook, Chapter Three 
                                Hume, Leibniz #1, #2 

Time 

Friday, April 11           Augustine, Confessions, Book XI 

Wednesday, April 16    Isaac Newton, Absolute Time 

Friday, April 18            Non-instructional day: No class

Wednesday, April 23     Library session

Friday, April 25             No class: 
      Use the time to find a source for your fifth paper

Metaphysics: Reality and Appearance 

Monday, April 28   Plato's Theaetetus (in course packet, page 15)
                          Outline is online

Wednesday, April 30    George Berkeley's Idealism 

Friday, May 2         

Monday, May 5           Aristotle on Tragedy 

Wednesday, May 7      Hume on Tragedy 


Basic Policies about the five paper assignments 

You will write five different kinds of papers:

  • A summary paper with simple documentation
  • A comparison and contrast paper
  • An advocacy paper or a critique
  • A simple argument paper
  • A thesis with limited research

The final (graded) version of each paper is to be typed. It is standard to use double-spacing, 12 point font, a cover page, and page numbering.

You must proofread your papers and fix any spelling or grammar mistakes before submitting them. (I strongly suggest using the "spell check" function on your word processing program.) Papers with numerous "typos" will be returned to you for cleanup, and will be reduced one grade step for each day you spend cleaning it up until it is satisfactory.

You will submit all five papers to me as a group at the time of the final exam. This is so that I can determine if you've made progress, which will be counted in your favor if your final grade is borderline. So make sure that you keep your papers in a safe place after getting them back from me.


Notice of disability services 

The Minnesota State University of Moorhead is committed to a policy of equal opportunity in education and employment and welcomes students with disabilities. We are prepared to to offer you a range of services to accommodate your needs.

However, students must accept responsibility for initiating the request for services. 

This can only be done by contacting:
Greg Toutges, Director of Disability Services, 
222 Comstock Memorial Union. 
Telephone: 299-5859 

Do not discuss your needs with me, your instructor. Talk to Greg and he will contact me.


PLAGIARISM POLICY

Plagiarism is passing off somebody else's writing or ideas as your own. There is nothing wrong in consulting any number of sources to help you understand what we are studying (whether an article in The Encyclopedia of Philosophy or a web site or Cliffs Notes) but it is stealing to take material without first paraphrasing it completely into your own words, or without placing it in quotation marks. (Rule of thumb: if you take more than two consecutive words from a source, put them in quotation marks, and if the idea behind a sentence comes from an outside source, acknowledge that source!) Any time you consult and draw on ideas from any source, you should cite your source. Taking ideas from another person and pretending that they are your own, original thoughts, is also plagiarism. The fact that your source was an assigned text for the course does not mitigate or lessen the seriousness of plagiarism.

Students sometimes claim unintentional or accidental plagiarism. It is difficult for an instructor to judge whether the plagiarism was intentional or unintentional. Basically, the latter occurs when a student reads a secondary source or takes notes, writes a paper without looking at the source or the notes, and accidentally uses phrasing and ideas from that source. Or a student may attempt to paraphrase an author's ideas, but fails to put it completely into his or her own words. (If you paraphrase and don't cite your source, that's evidence of intentional plagiarism.)

If evidence demonstrates that you have plagiarized any part of any written assignment for the course, the offense will be reported to the Vice President for Student Affairs and you will receive a failing grade for the course.

In short, if you use an outside source, simply provide footnotes or citations in parentheses where appropriate.

For further information,  click here. 


INTERPRETING YOUR GRADE  

Grade of "A": An excellent essay in all respects. Clear, grammatical, well organized, and progresses logically, with all elements relevant to the topic. Exhibits both original thought and an accurate grasp of the material. Grammatical errors kept to the very minimum.

Grade of "B": A good essay, but not outstanding. Overall organization is clear and coherent, although minor weaknesses may be present. Accurate presentation of material, but generally presents the minimum needed. Limited original thought. A few minor or subtle errors in punctuation and/or spelling.

Grade of "C": A satisfactory paper. Shows basic understanding, with some deficiencies. Organization not always clear and transitions abrupt or lacking. May contain irrelevant material. Weak support of ideas. Occasional grammatical mistakes, or sloppiness that could have been avoided.

Grade of "D": Minimally acceptable work. Marginal grasp of material, ineffective or confusing presentation. Summarizes the most obvious aspects of the material, but otherwise tends to be irrelevant. Little or no organization. Contains major grammatical problems.

Grade of "F": Unsatisfactory. Superficial, incoherent, and/or irrelevant. Writing ability verges on illiteracy. Plagiarism.

 

 

Return to Course
Home Page
  
Return to Theodore Gracyk's Home Page 

            Last updated May 1, 2003