Honors 308: Aesthetics of Music
Fall 2004 

First essay/exam assignment 
Second essay/exam assignment
Final Exam 

 


First Essay Exam: The essay is due on Wednesday, Oct.6. 

You are to write an essay, approximately five pages in length (about 1200-1300 words). You are to type/word process your essay. Use of sources other than Hanslick's book or Kivy's book requires proper citation. 

Your essay must have a cover page with a title and with your name. Do not put your name anywhere else on your essay. If you do not want to write on one of the following questions, then you are free to choose a topic. 

If you choose your own topic, you must present and defend a clear thesis, either defending or challenging a central idea presented by Hanslick or Kivy. However, I'd advise you to clear your topic with me, to make sure it is worth the effort. For additional details about my expectations, see http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/expectations%20of%20students/expectations.htm  

Suggested topics: 

1. Hanslick's entire book could be summarized by his remark "The artist is inscrutable, but the artwork is not." Explain how the two parts of this remark illustrate his negative and positive theses, then explain the strongest argument that he provides for each of the two theses. Illustrate the ideas in the essay with musical examples of your own choosing. 

2. What are the principal ways that Kivy agrees with Hanslick? What are important points on which he rejects Hanslick? (E.g., Kivy's enhanced formalism as opposed to Hanslick's purism.) Illustrate the ideas in the essay with musical examples of your own choosing. 

3. What are four different theories about the relationship between music and emotion? Explain them, explain which of the four seems correct to you, and explain a major criticism of the two that you reject. Illustrate the ideas in the essay with musical examples of your own choosing.


Second Essay: The essay is due on Friday, Nov. 19

You are to write an essay, approximately five pages in length (about 1200-1300 words). You are to type/word process your essay. Use of sources other than Gioia's book or Attali's book requires proper citation. 

Your essay must have a cover page with a title and with your name. Do not put your name anywhere else on your essay. If you do not want to write on one of the following questions, then you are free to choose a topic. 

If you choose your own topic, you must present and defend a clear thesis, either defending or challenging a central idea presented by Hanslick or Kivy. However, I'd advise you to clear your topic with me, to make sure it is worth the effort. 

For additional details about my expectations, see http://www.mnstate.edu/gracyk/expectations%20of%20students/expectations.htm  

Suggested topics: 

  1. Gioia's main idea is summarized in his book title. How would you explain his idea that jazz is an imperfect art? What implications does this idea have for our evaluation of a jazz performance? Going beyond Gioia, are there other kinds of music that his thesis would apply to? (Be careful to maintain the difference between boring music and being bored by it.) Illustrate your essay with musical examples of your own choosing.
  2. Gioia makes a distinction between neo-classical jazz, modernist jazz, romanticist jazz. What is the distinction and why does he make it? Which of the three does he think is most central to jazz, and why? Are there any problems with this view? How successfully can you extend the distinction to other types of music? Illustrate your essay with musical examples of your own choosing.
  3. What does Attali mean by noise? Does it have more than one meaning? In comparison, what is music? What does he think that the distinction reveals about the centrality of music in human life and human history? Illustrate your essay with musical examples of your own choosing. Finally, evaluate the plausibility of his thesis.

 

Final Exam 

The Final exam is worth 25% of your course grade. It is scheduled for noon on Monday, Dec. 13. You may use your books and notes, but you may not consult the materials brought by other students. You will have two hours to write an essay. At the start of the exam, I will direct you to answer one of the following questions:

  1. How would Attali explain the supposed superiority of attending live performances of music, rather than listening to recordings? (To answer, think about which of the four stages it involves.) How would Kivy defend the superiority of attending live performances of CLASSICAL music? How would Scruton? Explain the differences in the assumptions made by Attali and those made by Scruton and Kivy. Finally, what is your own position on this debate? 
  2. What is the intentional realm, and what is its importance in understanding the process of listening to music? (What does it explain that we cannot otherwise explain?) Does Kivy recognize the importance of the intentional realm? If so, how? Does Attali recognize the importance of the intentional realm? Do you have more agreement with Kivy or with Attali? Explain.
  3. What is the intentional realm, and what is its importance in understanding the process of listening to music? (What does it explain that we cannot otherwise explain?) Does Kivy recognize the importance of the intentional realm? If so, how? Why do some writers think it important to understand HOW the musical sounds are produced? If so, how plausible are Scruton's views about the intentional realm? 
  4. What is valuable about listening to music? Compare and contrast two different authors we have read on this topic. Do you agree with either? Explain.

 

Return to 
Theodore Gracyk's
HomePage
  
               
       For email, click here 

  Last updated Dec. 2, 2004