CNSA > Current Students > CNSA Style Manual
| CNSA Handbook | CNSA Style Manual | Internships | Web Links | Photos | Video Basics | ListServ Instructions | Thesis |
CNSA Style Manual
Chapter V -- The Thesis
Chapter 01 | Chapter 02 | Chapter 03 | Chapter 04 | Style Manual Index
Thesis Outline | Thesis Checklist | Evaluating Reports of Research
This chapter presents basic information on the structure and content of the master's thesis. It includes a thesis outline, a chapter-by-chapter checklist for you to follow, and a list of questions to help you evaluate this report of your research. The tools provided in this chapter should give you a clear understanding of what is expected in your thesis.
CH I |
INTRODUCTION |
CH II |
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE |
CH III |
METHODOLOGY |
CH IV |
RESULTS |
CH V |
DISCUSSION |
REFERENCES |
The following section contains a checklist of thesis guidelines. If you follow all the guidelines on the checklist, you will probably need fewer revisions.
CNSA THESIS GUIDELINES
Overall
__ |
1. Margins are 1.5" on left and 1" on the other sides. Use a ruler to measure. |
__ |
2. Numbers are not on first pages of chapters, but are next to top and right margins in top right hand corner. Use a ruler to measure. |
__ |
3. Headings are at appropriate level. (See APA Manual, p. 113) |
__ |
4. Page numbers are all the same font as the text and not bold. |
__ |
5. The word "data" is followed by a plural verb. |
__ |
6. "Participants" is used instead of "subjects". |
__ |
7. Turn widows and orphans off: Do not have single lines at the top or bottom of a page. |
__ |
8. Do not have page long paragraphs anywhere in the thesis. Break them up so they are easier to read. |
__ |
9. Avoid the use of the first person: I, we, me, our. |
__ |
10. Courier font with 12 point is used throughout. No micro justification. |
__ |
11. All quotations have page numbers and only quotations have page numbers. |
Front Matter
__ |
1. Cover page is spaced appropriately. |
__ |
2. Cover page content is correct. |
__ |
3. Announcement page has correct content and spacing with no page number. |
__ |
4. Acknowledgments page has correct content, spacing, and lower case Roman numbers (ii) at center bottom of page. |
__ |
5. Table of Contents has correct format, spacing, and numbering. |
__ |
6. Table of Contents has headings that are identical to those in the text, including same level. Note single and double spacing. |
__ |
7. List of Tables has correct format, spacing, and numbering. |
__ |
8. List of Figures has correct format, spacing, and numbering. |
__ |
9. Chapter numbers use Roman (I, II) instead of Arabic (1, 2). |
Chapter I
__ |
1. Chapter I is a Level 5 heading. |
__ |
2. Introduction is a Level 1 heading. |
__ |
3. No page number on first page. |
__ |
4. The following Level 3 headings occur in the following order: Statement of the Problem, Purpose of the Study, Research Question(s) or Hypothesis(es), Definition of Terms, Significance of the Study, and Limitations of the Study. |
__ |
5. Statement of the Problem section goes from the general to the specific. |
__ |
6. Purpose section has a sentence in it that says, "The purpose of this study was to.." |
__ |
7. Research questions or hypotheses are stated so that they meet Borg and Gall criteria, as stated on pp. 68-70 in the 5th edition. |
__ |
8. Only concepts defined are Level 4 headings. |
__ |
9. All concepts defined are Level 4 headings. |
__ |
10. Concepts that are defined are alphabetized. |
__ |
11. For all concepts defined, the concept is repeated in a complete sentence after the heading. |
__ |
12. The Significance of the Study section tells why it is important to conduct the study. |
__ |
13. The Limitations section contains at least three limitations. Some possible limitations are: the sample may not be representative, the tests may not measure what they were supposed to measure or may not measure it well, and another limitation. |
__ |
14. If you used volunteers, then this is automatically another limitation. See Borg and Gall (5th ed.), pp. 227-230 to identify ways in which your volunteers are likely to differ from non-volunteer participants. |
Chapter II
__ |
1. Chapter II is a Level 5 heading. |
__ |
2. Literature Review is a Level 1 heading. |
__ |
3. No page number on first page. |
__ |
4. The introductory paragraph(s) end with a sentence that lists the Level 3 headings in the chapter in the same words as the headings and in the same order. |
__ |
5. In general, there is a section for each major concept in the hypothesis as well as sections for studies that are similar to the one being conducted. |
__ |
6. Each section starts off with an introductory paragraph telling what the section is about. |
__ |
7. Topics are discussed in the same order as introduced in the introductory paragraph. |
__ |
8. Each paragraph starts off with a topic sentence and items within the paragraph are related to the topic of the topic sentence. |
__ |
9. Each section ends with a summary paragraph which gives the author's conclusions about the topics discussed in the section. In general, there is no new information and no references in the summaries. |
__ |
10. The last section in Chapter II is a section entitled Summary, with a Level 3 heading. This summary section summarizes the author's conclusions from the literature review. |
__ |
11. Section and chapter summaries include the author's own personal evaluations of the topics discussed. What does the literature reviewed mean to the author? The author should share his or her thinking with the reader. |
Chapter III
__ |
1. Chapter III is a Level 5 heading. |
__ |
2. Methodology is a Level 1 heading. |
__ |
3. No page number is on the first page. |
__ |
4. There is an introductory paragraph. |
__ |
5. There are at least four sections given as Level 3 headings and in the following order: Participants, Measures, Procedures, and Data Analysis. |
__ |
6. The Participants section tells about the population and sample in detail and meets the criteria given by Borg and Gall (5th ed.), p. 219. |
__ |
7. The Measures section has sections devoted to each test (or measure, instrument, or treatment) used in the study. Each test has at least one paragraph devoted to the validity of the test and one paragraph devoted to the reliability of the study. Make sure that actual coefficients (r = .56) or ranges of coefficients are given for both reliability and validity for each test. If there are no validity or reliability coefficients for a test (hopefully you did not use such a test) then state either that fact or that the authors did not report actual coefficients. |
__ |
8. The Procedures section describes what you did in sufficient detail that another researcher can duplicate or replicate what you did. |
__ |
9. The Data Analysis section should state what statistics you used and why you selected them. Your advisor may help you with this. |
__ |
10. If there is demographic data about your participants you may report them in the Participants section. This keeps your Results chapter cleaner. However, you may report the demographic data in your Results chapter. If you do your demographic data in the Results chapter, you would report them first as Demographic Data. |
Chapter IV
__ |
1. Chapter IV is a Level 5 heading. |
__ |
2. Results is a Level 1 heading. |
__ |
3. No page number on first page. |
__ |
4. If there are Level 3 headings in this chapter, usually they are for each hypothesis or research question. |
__ |
5. If you administered tests, you will usually want to report the range of scores for each test. Each range should be presented in a table which lists the scores for each participant, starting with the highest score and ending with the smallest score. If you divided the scores in any way, draw lines indicated where these divisions or cutoffs were made (e.g., High, Medium, and Low). |
__ |
6. For each table, the information in the text should summarize all the information in the table. |
__ |
7. Tables should appear on the same or next page after they are mentioned in the text. |
__ |
8. Move text up so that it fills in white spaces around tables. |
__ |
9. Tables and Figures follow format essentially as given in examples attached. (See pp. 147-201 in APA Manual.) You may use bold lines across the top and bottom to set off your table (as in example Table 1) if you wish and your software will do it. You do not need to do this. [I have crammed the example tables on the page so they would fit-so the spacing is not correct.] |
__ |
10. See pp. 137-140 in APA Manual for ways to present statistics in the text. |
Chapter V
__ |
1. Chapter V is a Level 5 heading. |
__ |
2. Discussion is a Level 1 heading. |
__ |
3. No page number is on the first page. |
__ |
4. Provide a brief paragraph summary of the purpose and findings of your study. |
__ |
5. Discuss all the results reported in Chapter IV and what you think they mean. Discuss them in the same order as they were presented in Chapter IV; in other words, research question or hypothesis order. |
__ |
6. You may draw conclusions from your discussion, but this is not necessary. |
__ |
7. Close the chapter with a section called Recommendations, which is a Level 3 heading. |
References
__ |
1. References is a Level 5 heading. Page is numbered in upper right. |
__ |
2. References are in alphabetical order. |
__ |
3. All references in the text are in the Reference section; only the references in the text are in the References section; and all references in the text match (in terms of author's name and date) the references in the References section. |
__ |
4. All references use the hanging indent. Indent starts under fourth letter (hit space bar three times.) |
__ |
5. All references follow APA style. See pp. 207-281 in APA Manual. |
__ |
6. Each Appendix had a cover sheet with APPENDIX A (etc., Level 5 heading) centered on the page. Double spaced below APPENDIX A is the title of the appendix in Level 1 heading. |
__ |
7. All appendix pages are numbered in upper right corner. |
Evaluating Reports of Research (or Theses)
The list of questions below serves as another type of checklist. Thinking about these questions while planning and revising your thesis may help with the actual writing. This evaluation is also very helpful for writing the limitations and conclusion sections of your thesis.
Introduction
- Is there a statement of the problem?
- Is the problem "researchable"?
- Is background information on the problem presented?
- Is the significance of the problem discussed?
- Does the problem statement indicate the variables of interest and the specific relationship between those variables that was investigated?
Hypotheses
- Are specific questions to be answered listed or specific hypotheses to be tested stated?
- Does each hypothesis state an expected relationship or difference between two variables?
- If necessary, are variables directly or operationally defined?
- Is each hypothesis testable?
Review of Related Literature
- Is the review comprehensive?
- Are all references cited relevant to the problem under investigation?
- Are the sources mostly primary or were a number of secondary sources cited?
- Have references been critically analyzed and the results of the various studies compared and contrasted, or is the review basically a series of abstracts or annotations?
- Is the review well organized? Does it flow logically, and in such a way that the references least related to the problem are discussed first and the most related references are discussed last?
- Does the review conclude with a brief summary of the literature and its implications for the problem investigated?
- Do the implications discussed form an empirical or theoretical rationale for the hypotheses which follow?
Method
Participants
- Are the size and major characteristics of the population studies described?
- Was the entire population studied?
- How were participants selected?
- Is the method of selecting the participants clearly described?
- Is this method of participant selection one that is likely to result in a representative, unbiased group of participants?
- Were volunteers used?
- Are the numbers and major characteristics of the participants described?
- Does the number of the participants meet the suggested guidelines for minimum sample size appropriate for the method of research represented?
Instruments
- Is a rationale given for selection of the instruments used?
- Is each instrument described in terms of purpose and content?
- Are the instruments appropriate for measuring the intended variables?
- If an instrument was developed specifically for the study, are the procedures involved in its development and validation described?
- Is evidence presented indicating that each instrument is appropriate for the sample under study?
- Is instrument validity discussed and coefficients given if appropriate?
- Is reliability discussed in terms of type and size of reliability coefficients?
- If appropriate, are subtest reliabilities given?
- If an instrument was specifically developed for the study, are administration, scoring, and interpretation procedures fully described?
Design and Procedures
- Is the design appropriate for testing the hypothesis?
- Are the procedures described in sufficient detail to permit them to be replicated by another researcher?
- Was a pilot study conducted?
- If a pilot study was conducted are its execution and results described as well as its impact on the subsequent study?
- Are control procedures described?
- Are there any potentially confounding variables which were not controlled?
