|
Political Science
Assessment Report
October, 1999
Summary of Data
The attached summary reports assessment statistics from the
fall, 1998 and spring, 1999 semesters. A total of 15 students were assessed by the two
faculty members teaching the senior seminar in those semesters different faculty
than performed the assessment last year. As the data are ordinal not interval, means and
standard deviations are meaningless. The median for each measure is presented.
Results are minimally different from the last assessment report of a
year ago. Any competent research methodologist would note that the differences are most
likely due to the small sample sizes and the differences in the standards used by the
faculty doing the evaluation. Overall, assessment of student performance is above-average.
This indicates that political science majors are learning what we want them to learn.
Students are particularly successful in developing communications skills. The relatively
strong oral communication skills reflect a somewhat greater emphasis on this by faculty in
recent years. Students show a relative weakness (though still above average) in certain
aspects of the research process related to research design and measurement and the effects
of these on conclusions.
Curriculum
There are no clear implications for the curriculum from these
results. Our students do well. We knew that. These results support the curriculum
revisions made by the department before any assessment results were known (suggesting that
faculty do in fact know and respond to the strengths and weaknesses of students without
the added burden of "assessment"). The department will be offering a new
200-level course designed to replace Pol 110 as the introduction to the discipline for
political science majors. The new course is designed to introduce students to the nature
of conceptual processes in the discipline and to the major questions and theories of the
various fields of political science. It will also serve to introduce students to the
professional literature earlier in their program of study. Many of these topics are now
treated briefly in the research methods course (Pol 310); students will be introduced to
them earlier, which will allow them to exercise these skills in other courses. It will
also permit the methods course to focus more on the research process. These changes should
improve students skills on those items where they are shown to be relatively weak,
as well as improving on their strengths in communication.
Budgeting
There are no budgetary implications in these results.
Retention and Recruitment
There are no implications for retention and recruitment.
Prospective students are interested in the variety of careers available to majors and how
successful our graduates are in those careers. We provide this information, which is much
more likely to be persuasive. I have never had a student, prospective student, or parent
indicate any interest in data such as these.
Public Relations
These results indicate that our students are above average
well above, on some skills. This is consistent with how others view our department.
These results are also irrelevant for public relations. On campus, were judged by
the quality of our faculty and the abilities of our students as others experience them.
Off campus, were judged by our students success and performance in their
careers. Or, in the case of MnSCU, whether were above or below the system (including
community colleges) average in cost per credit hour.
Revisions to the Assessment Plan
No revisions are planned or needed. Assessment Summary
Student Effort
| Student's effort/commitment
to learning: |
8.0 |
Ability to Read Analytically
| Ability to identify
relevant library materials: |
8.0 |
| Ability to identify and
understand theoretical concepts: |
8.0 |
| Ability to understand the
logic of causal and theoretical arguments: |
8.0 |
| Ability to understand
research design and measurement issues: |
7.0 |
| Ability to understand
research conclusions and their implications: |
6.0 |
| |
|
| Ability to Think Critically |
|
| Ability to identify and
evaluate assumptions in the literature: |
8.0 |
| Ability to integrate a
literature: |
7.0 |
| Ability to evaluate
conclusions in light of research design and evidence: |
6.5 |
| Ability to identify
unresolved questions in the literature: |
6.0 |
| |
|
| Ability to Organize Ideas |
|
| Ability to define a clear,
precise question: |
7.5 |
| Ability to relate a
question to current knowledge: |
7.0 |
| Ability to understand
relationships between concepts: |
8.0 |
| Ability to develop a clear
theoretical argument: |
6.0 |
| Ability to design a
research project to address a question: |
7.0 |
| Ability to define and
gather relevant evidence: |
8.0 |
| Ability to draw conclusions
in light of evidence: |
8.0 |
| Ability to understand
implications & consequences of conclusions: |
7.0 |
| |
|
| Ability to Communicate Orally |
|
| Ability to present material
in a logically organized manner: |
8.0 |
| Ability to speak clearly
and precisely: |
8.0 |
| Ability to speak
appropriately for the audience: |
8.0 |
| Ability to explain points
for the audience: |
8.0 |
| |
|
| Ability to Communicate in Writing |
|
| Ability to present a
logically organized paper: |
7.0 |
| Ability to explain points
clearly and precisely: |
7.0 |
| Ability to use proper
English (grammar, punctuation, etc.): |
8.0 |
| Ability to use style
conventions of political science: |
7.0 |
|