Master of
Science
Public, Human Service and Health Administration
Biennial Report 1999-2001
February, 2002
This report follows the seven categories listed by the MSUM
Academic Affairs office.
1)
Assessment measures
Completion of the PHSHA program involves each student
conducting an administrative research project and presenting the findings and
analysis in the form of a “Final Project” paper. That project is defended before a four-member committee of
Graduate Faculty members including one member appointed by the Graduate
Director. The oral exam can focus
on the student’s course work, as well as the project paper.
This provides an opportunity for faculty members to evaluate the
student’s performance against professional expectations and in comparison with
other students who have completed the process.
Assessment of the student’s performance is conducted using an
instrument that has been reviewed by the Institutional Assessment Committee.
For this reporting period the assessment scores for students on whom we
have data is as follows. (Based on
a five point scale with 5 excellent, 3 average, and 1 poor.
|
Development and present clear and concise research questions
|
|
|
Average – 3.8
|
Median – 4
|
|
|
Develop appropriate methods to answer those questions
|
|
|
Average – 3.9
|
Median – 4
|
|
|
Integrate and evaluate appropriate literature
|
|
|
Average – 3.8
|
Median – 4
|
|
|
Analyze data and draw appropriate conclusions
|
|
|
Average – 4
|
Median – 4
|
|
|
Communicate logically the reasoning, methodology and results
|
|
|
Average – 4.1
|
Median – 4
|
|
Obviously, these scores reflect programmatic qualities plus
the differing levels of ability and achievement by the students who completed
the program during this reporting period. Even
with these variations among students, there is a consistent set of scores for
each category evaluated. The
evidence indicates that the program is performing well and that students are
learning what is expected within the context of professional standards.
2)
Global and regional outreach efforts of the program.
The program has a WEB site (www.mnstate.edu/phsha/)
that has led to a number of email inquiries concerning the program from around
the United States. We also
advertise in The Forum newspaper each spring.
The program Coordinator has attended Chamber of Commerce events sponsored
by the local educational institutions of higher education. Our brochures and sometimes the Coordinator has been present
a job fairs in the Tri-College and any other events attended by the Graduate
Studies Office. A “Help
Yourself Help Others” advertisement appears in the Fall or Spring MSUM
Class Schedule on a regular basis.
3)
Curricular goals and achievements in last two years.
In our six-year review document we listed as one of our
goals to market the program more aggressively to health care professionals.
In 2000-2001 the name of the program was changed from “Public and Human
Service Administration” to “Public, Human Service and Health
Administration.” Several courses within the Health Administration
undergraduate program were modified to allow for graduate registration and
credit. We have defined three
“tracks” with emphasis in either public, human service or health
administration. Along with a more
aggressive marketing effort among our alumni, we are experiencing a noticeable
increase in inquiries from people within the health delivery sector of our
region. No major changes have been
explored in the basic curriculum of the program since we meet annually with our
Advisory Committee and try to incorporate their suggestions where a particular
emphasis is proposed.
4)
Summary of faculty research and scholarship.
All faculty members in the program are proficient at
using the WEB as a research source.
Several faculty members have made research presentations at conferences
and published articles or reviews in academic journals.
Adjunct faculty members who have taught in the program are carefully
chosen based on their educational achievements as well as professional
experience and competence. They
have demonstrated their commitment to scholarship by carefully choosing and
assigning up-to-date textbooks and journal articles
5)
Summary of professional development activities (conferences and grants)
All regular (non adjunct) faculty in the program have
Graduate Faculty status at MSUM. This
means that they not only teach graduate courses, but that they attend relevant
academic conferences, conduct appropriate research and keep themselves abreast
of developments in their fields. Faculty
who teach in the program have helped schedule training opportunities for faculty
members at MSUM to upgrade computer skills and incorporate technology into
instruction. Most of them use their
personal WEB sites for providing information to students and fellow
professionals.
6)
Summary of emerging sectors and efforts to cope with challenges
As referenced under item three above, the program has
been involved in developing curricula and implementing a marketing initiative
for health delivery professionals. Our
annual meetings with our Advisory Committee provide an opportunity to solicit
ideas and suggestions from well-respected leaders within the fields served by
our program. We have Advisory
Committee members from local government, federal courts, hospitals and clinics,
arts organizations, inter-governmental agencies and traditional human service
sectors of our society. Additionally,
faculty members keep abreast of developments by their professional activities,
including reading, research and scholarship.
7)
Summary of strengths and weaknesses and strategies to address
The two major strengths of this program are its faculty
and the focus and quality of the curriculum.
Alumni who return for our annual banquet regularly remind us of the
relationship between what they learned in the program and their professional
achievements. Our regular faculty
members have terminal degrees in their fields.
We have a strong and growing network of former students, Advisory
Committee members and professional contacts within the region that help us to
respond to the needs of our clientele.
The major weakness of the program is related to
marketing. In spite of this, our
enrollments have remained steady and appear to be growing this year (the
beginning class enrollment was up and inquires have been steady).
Other graduate programs at MSUM share concerns about marketing.
Currently the Graduate Studies Committee is trying to develop some
marketing strategies that can attract students who are otherwise tempted by the
“degree sellers” that are present in the Fargo-Moorhead market.
We rely on our alumni and professional contacts within the region to
provide information to prospective students.
Our WEB page is inexpensive public relations, but a higher marketing
profile for the program will require some investment of resources by the
university.
|