







|
Chemistry
Assessment Report 1999
A. Summary of Data
Assessment data include faculty ratings
of student performance in research and faculty ratings of
student performance in senior seminars. The department has
not yet established targets for desired averages on the
rated items. Instead, since this is the first round of data
collected under the current plan, we are establishing a
baseline for future comparisons.
An exit interview of graduating seniors
was also taken. Since the questions were conversational
in nature, the information gained was anecdotal.
B. Commentary
The five areas of the Research Rating
Scale correspond to the department's stated 5 outcome goals
(basic understanding; analytical thinking/problem solving;
laboratory expertise; experimental design; and communication
skill).
Overall, faculty ratings of student performance
in these areas was favorable. The averages (scale of 1-5)
for all of the research students ranged from 2.8-3.5, and
showed no obvious weaknesses in any particular area. When
the averages of junior and senior level students alone are
considered, they range from 3.6-4.1. A general progression
in student performance as they move from Research 1 to Research
2 to Research 3 is obvious, particularly between Research
1 and Research 2.
The faculty ratings (scale of 1-5) of
the student seminars were also favorable, although the sample
size is very small. The student responses in the exit
interviews were extremely favorable across the board. One
concern was the perceived difficulty of the program, which
the students considered to be harder than other majors.
What are the
implications in the following areas?
Curriculum: These
results give no clear mandate to make curriculum changes.
However, in response to the perception that the chemistry
major is a very hard major, we are reintroducing a BA degree
that will not demand quite as many upper level courses as
our Chemical Society-certified BS degree.
Budget: There are
no clear budgetary implications in the current results.
It is worth noting, however, that the evaluation of student
performance regarding laboratory techniques and use of chemistry
instrumentation was based on their ability to use what was
available, not what was unavailable!
Retention/Recruitment/Public Relations: The enrollment numbers show a substantial decrease after
Research 1 (Chem 297). This is an issue that has been discussed
in the department, and has been addressed in part by introduction
of the BA degree. However, many of the students who enroll
in Research 1 are not chemistry majors. (For example, science
education students are not required to participate in research,
but often take Research 1 on a voluntary basis. In addition,
a number of biology majors take Research 1.) Therefore,
the enrollment drop after Research 1 is expected and does
not reflect a problem In addition, students who enroll in
Research 1 subsequently diverge between Research 2 (Chem
397) and Biotech (Chem 476/477).
These first results appear to be promising.
We can use them to tell current and prospective students
that our students successfully accomplish our student learning
goals.
Revisions to the Assessment Plan:
Because of the small number of graduating majors, it will
take some time in order to gather a meaningful supply of
exit-survey type data. However we would like to institute
a graduating senior self-rating form that is quantitative
in nature to supplement the exit interviews. This will provide
some quantitative assessment regarding student satisfaction
upon completing the program It will then be useful to contrast
the exit survey versus results from the alumni survey.
The following rating scale is used by faculty to rate each
student's performance in Undergraduate Chemistry Research
1,2, and 3 (Chem 297,397, and 497 respectively) as well
as the performance of students in the research aspect of
Biotech (Chem 477). The sample sizes were:
| |
Research I Chem 297 |
18
|
|
| |
Research 2 Chem 397 |
7
|
|
| |
Biotech Chem 476/477
|
5
|
|
| |
Research 3 Chem 497 |
4
|
|
| |
TOTAL
|
34 |
|
NOTE: Copies of data can
be obtained from the assessment coordinator or the Chemistry
Department. |