![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Psychology
Links to Assessment Measures: I. Long Range Departmental Goals The psychology faculty has established three sets of long-term goals to serve as guides for our department. Part two is particularly relevant to student outcomes. It follows: We seek to provide majors with a rigorous traditional psychology curriculum which prepares them for diverse futures in graduate/professional schools and within the profession. Within this context, our goals are to develop students who:
II. Student Performance Objectives These performance objectives will be used as a basis for our assessment plan. They are directly reflected in two of our assessment instruments. Their relationship to our long range goals is noted. 1. Students can demonstrate knowledge and appreciation of
basic concepts and theories in (a) Students know the principles and
theories of psychology 2. Students can demonstrate communication skills within the discipline of psychology (long range goal 2f) (a) Students can demonstrate technical
writing skills, APA format 3. Students can demonstrate research skill. in psychology (long range goals 2d, 2e) (a) Students are capable of using library
and other resources III. Components of the Assessment Plan 1. A Senior Exit Questionnaire - When seniors bring their graduate application forms to the department chair they are asked to fill out an evaluation form. This questionnaire includes all performance objectives and is attached. 2. A Senior Course Rating Sheet - Faculty members teaching senior seminars and the advanced experimental courses rate the students on items related to our objectives. This is done in addition to traditional grades which are more global. This Senior Course Rating Sheet also addresses all the performance objectives and is attached. 3. Student Publications and Presentations - Psychology students often present oral presentations or poster presentations based on their research projects. The presentations may occur at national, regional, state or local conferences. Some of them may be based on joint efforts with faculty members as coauthor, but most are not. The projects presented at national and regional conferences are evaluated by representatives of those organizations. They are not accepted unless they meet professional standards which are similar to our objectives. This assessment is obviously more global, but it does provide an external assessment of our student's performance. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|